New U.S.-Mexico Border National Park?

Both governments plan to move forward, but security woes dog the project

Heading out the door? Read this article on the new Outside+ app available now on iOS devices for members! Download the app.

Texas’s Big Bend National Park is a borderland of striking desert canyons, rocky mesas, and high-altitude forests—and it’s supposedly even more grand on the Mexican side. There, peaks rise to 10,000 feet, and bears and bighorns roam a reportedly untrammeled wilderness. That’s partially what drove Presidents Obama and Calderon to move forward with plans to create an international peace park on the U.S.-Mexico border.

The park would be modeled after the wildly successful Waterton-Glacier Peace Park we co-manage with our do-gooder little brother Canada. But making a national park work on the southern border is a lot harder than the north. For one, we’d have to struggle to secure a rugged area known for drug smuggling that’s the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined.

Proponents claim that the Big Bend area is known for far less smuggling than other areas along the border— but local sheriff Ronnie Dodson still isn’t a fan.

Texas senator Kay Bailey Hutchison has promised to oppose an international park, but congressional rep for the Big Bend wrote the resolution to move forward with the park.

So how ’bout it? Are you in favor of an expanded Big Bend with wilder Mexican territory? 10,000-foot peaks and capable, international stewardship sound good to us, but let fly in the comments section below.

—Ted Alvarez

NPR via the Goat

Image Credit: UltraRob