Access Special Features, Register Now!
Online Exclusive

Prof Hike: The End of Off-the-Grid

Spot's new gadget adds satellite reception to smartphones anywhere.
With satellites hovering overhead, will we ever be truly alone? (JS)
Before you attack me for jumping to unproven conclusions, I admit that the link between trail technology and hiker error is not established. Not only are statistics about the impact of cell phones and satellite beacons on backcountry mishaps unavailable, but spectacular anecdotes often overshadow the limited figures we do have. One thing we do know, however, is that the number of NPS search-and-rescue missions initiated by cell phone, satellite phone, or personal locator beacon increased by almost 5 percent between 2004 and 2007. And most of those events occurred before the first Spot product became widely available.
On one hand, this 5 percent increase is a positive, life-saving trend. Search-and-rescue missions initiated by radio or satellite alerts can often locate a missing person faster than missions that require someone to hike out to seek help. 
On the other hand, can the presence of cell phones and satellite receivers on the trail also encourage less preparation and riskier decisions? Mobile technology already discourages planning ahead. Don’t believe me? Consider how cell phones changed the way we organize our social lives. With the ability to call or text on the run, most of us no longer arrange specific times and places to meet someone at a party or event. Unfortunately, that sort of casual planning doesn’t translate well to remote trails and signal-blocking peaks. 
Today, most backcountry 911 calls are made from cell phones connected—often gingerly—to the cellular grid. Presumably, the limits of that grid discourage cautious hikers from venturing deeper into forests, canyons, and other imposing terrain. Even though cellular reception isn’t a lifeline to civilization, many people treat it like one, and might retreat when service isn’t available: No phone reception? Then maybe we shouldn’t descend that cliff…
How will those decisions change, however, when a Spot Connect extends a smartphone-carrying hiker’s safety coverage to almost everywhere? Will better reception encourage riskier decisions and more calls for help? True, other Spot products and satellite phones have enabled communication from remote areas for years. But their high cost, limited messages, and small audiences kept them from changing search and rescue norms.
Smartphones, however, are different. Tens of millions of Americans already carry something labeled Blackberry, Android, or iPhone in their pocket, purse, or backpack. Plus, the Connect is likely the first of many new satellite-linked products and services designed to extend voice and data reception deeper into the backcountry. What impact could they have? 
This summer, will a hiker updating his Facebook status 10 times a day using a Spot Connect feel more inclined—perhaps even more entitled—to call 911 for a minor ankle sprain?  Next year will we read about more incidents like the S.O.S-button-pushing Grand Canyon hikers? And over time, will states respond to rising numbers of inappropriate rescue calls by instituting substantial fees like New Hampshire does?  Will the deathblow to “off-the-grid” adventure finally occur when a teenager updates his Facebook status with "Marmots are so kewt! ROTFLMAO!!!” from deep inside Colorado’s Weminuche Wilderness?
I’m the first to admit I don’t know what will happen next. Spot could sell 100,000 Connects this year, or only 10,000. Hikers who purchase Spot Connects could update their Twitter feeds with reckless abandon, yet only call for help when they really need it. And perhaps another company will create the must-have product that gives everyone’s smartphones satellite reception. 
What is certain, however, is that we need to create new guidelines and training for how satellite-enhanced communication devices should be used on the trail. For instance, no gadget should be considered a substitute for a detailed trail map and compass. And since Bluetooth connections suck battery life like a newborn vampire, any hiker who wants his Connect-linked smartphone to last should keep it turned off, or pack a solar-recharger. And here’s my contribution to the list: Treat cell phones and satellite beacons just like the emergency kit in the trunk of your car: You know the kit is there, but you should do everything possible not to use it.
Are you boiling over about satellites and search and rescue? Blow off some steam by posting a comment below, or send an email to
—Jason Stevenson

idiot's guide to backpacking and hikingJason Stevenson is the author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Backpacking and Hiking

Page 2 of 212

Leave a Reply