2 Free Issues and 3 Free Gifts!
Full Name:
Address 1:
Address 2:
Zip Code:
Email: (required)
If I like it and decide to continue, I'll pay just $12.00, and receive a full one-year subscription (9 issues in all), a 73% savings off the newsstand price! If for any reason I decide not to continue, I'll write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing.
Your subscription includes 3 FREE downloadable booklets.
Or click here to pay now and get 2 extra issues
Offer valid in US only.
Share your tales of travel & adventure with our step-by-step guide. Upload trail descriptions, photos, video, and more. Get Started
The DAILY DIRT - The nitty and the gritty of outdoor news

BACKPACKER Photo School: Rule of Thirds

The most talked-about rule of design--the Rule of Thirds--deserves it. Using the rule properly is crucial to making interesting photos.

Ever look a bunch of photos and just feel bored? Most likely the photos were taken with the subject in the center of each shot—the photographer probably used a point-and-shoot and, well, just pointed and shot. But no matter what kind of camera you’re using, there’s the opportunity to craft better photos simply by following the Rule of Thirds.

The point of the Rule of Thirds is to avoid placing the photo’s subject in the center and avoid dividing the photo directly in half. Do this the easy way: Imagine dividing the space in your viewfinder by thirds with imaginary horizontal and vertical lines. Then, place your main subjects along those lines. You can use real objects—the horizon, trees, or anything that creates a separation between two areas—to clearly mark those lines. You can even divide the space with the foreground and background.

Choosing to put the subject or divisions along your imaginary lines will automatically make the photo more interesting to look at. Your eyes will wander around the whole picture, instead of staying glued to the center, and you'll want to look at the photo for longer. Let’s look at a few applications:

I love this reader photo of Mt. Jefferson, in Oregon, sent in for our Fall Foliage Slideshow. It shows the perfect application of the Rule of Thirds. The bottom third is foreground: pretty, bright yellow foliage. The mountain is along the line I drew for the upper third. The dark bush on the right also takes up about a third.

Don’t bother being too exact about your thirds; some people would say you have to put the subject at the intersections of the imaginary lines, but I don’t think you have to be quite so strict. The point of this rule is to avoid everything converging around the center. As an example, I cropped one of my photos in two different ways. Which of these do you find more interesting to look at?

The one on the right features a very centered subject. In the one on the left, the hiker is still the main subject of the photo, but she’s not centered. Also, keep in mind that there are other things to look at in the photo. The photo has 3 horizontal sections: grass, trees, and sky. The photo on the right is divided exactly in half with grass on the bottom half and dark green trees on top.

Keep in mind, this doesn’t mean you should always shoot wider to show more of the surroundings. Almost every time you take a photo, you should decide where to put the horizon line. Moving it up to the top third of the photo changes the angle of the photo. What’s not shown in sky is converted to foreground, which brings the scene closer to the viewer.

Here’s a photo where I followed the Rule of Thirds by putting the horizon higher than center. I made a frame around what would have been included if I had centered the horizon. By following the Rule of Thirds, the framing I used will draw a viewer from the bottom of the photo out into the rest of the scene.

Of course, sometimes the sky is the interesting part of the scene, and then it makes sense to move the horizon line down instead of up. This often happens with beautiful sunset photos, where the ground is mostly black and the sky is illuminated and colorful, like in this photo entered into our Reader Photo Contest earlier this year.

Here’s a little trick I use to remind myself about the Rule of Thirds: A lot of cameras I use have markings on the viewfinder or the screen. They’re usually lights to show where my focus is, or cursors that show the center. When I see these, I think about where they align in comparison to the center of the photo, or in comparison to the lines dividing my photo into thirds. Then I know when I’m taking photos whether to keep my subject away from those marks (if they’re centered), or use those as suggestions of where to put my subject (if they’re where my imaginary lines would intersect, like in the photo below).

So next time you’re ready to snap your next portrait or landscape, think of the Rule of Thirds first. It's the easiest thing you can do to keep your point-and-shoot shot from looking like one.

—Genny Fullerton

Photos by (from top) Clint Sturdevant, Genny Fullerton (2), John Hawkins, Rita Marie Gordon


Oct 24, 2009

Josh, thanks for pointing that out. When the photo is this small it's hard to see the hiker, but usually we look at photos much bigger than this. You definitely want variety in your photos, so you don't need to use the rule of thirds on every shot. When you're trying to take a photo that you'll look at for more than a quick second, to show more than just who the hiker is, including more landscape and using an interesting composition will be better.

Oct 24, 2009

I think the point is that, while the photo of the hiker in the middle may be more interesting to that person, the PHOTO is more interesting when the hiker is not simply in the center. The way you suggest, it's just a snapshot of a hiker. Interesting for a moment. The way the author suggests, the photo holds our attention much longer. It is much more memorable.

josh ward
Oct 23, 2009

i submitted this once but it hasn't posted, so, if this shows up twice, i'm sorry. when the rule is implied to the hiker, it looks to me as if the landscape is the subject and not the hiker. how do you use the rule and still have the personal detail of the hiker? i'm new to photography so any advice is helpful. thanks

josh ward
Oct 23, 2009

When doing a landscape shot, i can see the rule being implied but on the pic of the hiker, i'm a little lost. If the hiker is the subject, wouldn't you want them closer to show more of their personal detail? to me, the pic used for the rule example looks like the landscape is the subject and not the hiker. i'm new to photography so please help!!thanks


Your rating:
Your Name:


My Profile Join Now

Most recent threads

Trailhead Register
Trekking the Huayhuash
Posted On: Aug 29, 2014
Submitted By: RebeccaD
Trailhead Register
bicycling question
Posted On: Aug 29, 2014
Submitted By: hikerjer
View all Gear
Find a retailer

Special sections - Expert handbooks for key trails, techniques and gear

Check out Montana in Warren Miller's Ticket to Ride
Warren Miller athletes charge hard and reflect on Big Sky country, their love for this space and the immense energy allotted to the people who reside in Montana.

Boost Your Apps
Add powerful tools and exclusive maps to your BACKPACKER apps through our partnership with Trimble Outdoors.

Carry the Best Maps
With BACKPACKER PRO Maps, get life-list destinations and local trips on adventure-ready waterproof myTopo paper.

FREE Rocky Mountain Trip Planner
Sign up for a free Rocky Mountain National Park trip planning kit from our sister site

Follow BackpackerMag on Twitter Follow Backpacker on Facebook
Get 2 FREE Trial Issues and 3 FREE GIFTS
Survival Skills 101 • Eat Better
The Best Trails in America
YES! Please send me my FREE trial issues of Backpacker
and my 3 FREE downloadable booklets.
Full Name:
Address 1:
Zip Code:
Address 2:
Email (required):
Free trial offer valid for US subscribers only. Canadian subscriptions | International subscriptions