READERS COMMENTS

The intended users of this pack are likely to have a base weight of 9-12lbs and could make it work for unsupported trips of a week or more (assuming access to water is adequate). If you think this is a weekend pack, then you probably are still transitioning to lightweight backpacking, and it is likely not the best choice for you. For those of you who are transitioning to UL, most budding UL'ers will be better off changing packs as the final step of the transition - trying to fit non-UL gear into an UL pack can be difficult (and uncomfortable!).
Posted: Apr 26, 2012 Joe

I carried the Windrider for more than 1/2 the A/T after another light weight pack failed. The Windrider out performed any of the other packs on the trail. Water proof, easy to load( the white color lets light in) comfortable with loads from 20 to 30 lbs. No order retention, durable and the same size as me so it doesn't get hung up in the tight spots on the trail.

If you are planning a thru hike or weekend trip this is the pack.
Posted: Nov 17, 2011 Matt

For the ultimate ultralight pack that is also waterproof and strong consider the Blast3200 made of cuben fiber by Joe Valesko of ZPacks. I have used one for the past 3 years. For a 7 day trip my pack load starts with 25-27 lbs that is carried comfortably. The ZPack weighs only 5 ounces (less without options).
Posted: May 24, 2011 eastbayhiker

I still have to say the Osprey Exos 58 is a much better choice for a weekend UL pack. 40 liters just isn't enough for a two to three night trip. The Osprey is only 1 pound more and had nearly 50% more volume. I don't carry more than 30 lbs. in it, and it has many more features than this pack.
Posted: May 17, 2011 Eric Nelson

ADD A COMMENT