| NATIONAL PARKS QUICKLINKS |
Backpacker Magazine – August 2001
How light can you go? Six friends face off to determine whether carrying less gear makes you half as macho, or twice as smart.
Some heavyweights might prefer getting to camp early and enjoying the benefits of the extra weight they've carried by sipping coffee, reading a book, and overlooking the scenery from their comfortable camp chairs. In the case of our heavyweights, though, it's envy that registers. "I wanted to join you," says Marc, " but I was spent." The Lightniks take the round.
Lightniks 6 Heavies 4
| Round 9 |
Eventually, we intersect the trail bordering the White River. Steve and I want to know how quickly we can comfortably cover the 11 miles separating us from the cars. Two hours and 15 minutes later, after combining slow jogging and fast walking, we have our answer. More than an hour faster than the closest heavy, the lightweights take the round.
Lightniks 7 Heavies 4
And The Winners Are...
The real test of this showdown would be whether the members of one side defected to the other side, and in the end most of the Heavies were swayed. Marc wasn't sure he could halve his pack weight, but felt certain he could shed 15 to 20 pounds. Margareta was impressed with our footwear and commented, "I think light shoes were the biggest item in making travel easier. I'll probably switch." Chris had studied our techniques and technology more closely than anyone else, and at trip's end announced, "I'm not going out there with a heavy pack again."
Meanwhile, even though our route was far more rugged than the average backpacking trip, Steve and I found nothing lacking in our lightweight systems. A week later, carrying the same kit (minus 5 pounds of climbing gear), he completed Mt. Rainier's 93-mile-long Wonderland Trail in 3 days.
See Light Loads, in sidebar at right, for the complete list of what the Lightniks carried. See Related Articles, at right, for reviews of the lightweight gear featured in this story, as well as other reviews and feature articles.
Put Your Pack On A Diet
| Use This... (bring) | Insteed of this... (don't bring) | Saving (lbs., oz.) | |
| Downsize | film canisters to carry toothpaste, sunscreen | original packaging | 0,4 |
| a 3/4-length sleeping pad | a full-length model | 0,6 | |
| a smaller pack (3,000 cu. in.) | a 5,000 cu. in. pack | 2,0 | |
| duct tape, sticks for splints, a bandanna, a limited supply of painkillers, innovation | adhesive tape, moleskin, bandages, splints, elastic bandages, and a pharmacopoeia of drugs | 0,8 | |
| Double Up | boxer shorts w/fly sewn shut | shorts and swimsuit | 0,8 |
| stuff sacks for knickknacks | camp shoes (slip sacks over socks) | 0,9 | |
| wear your coat to bed and carry a lighter sleeping bag | sleeping bag rated below the lowest temperature you expect to encounter | 1,8 | |
| Leave It Out | camp chair | 1,2 | |
| extra cook pot | 0,7 | ||
| long underwear bottoms | 0,6 | ||
| trash: discard all extra food packaging at home | 1,0 | ||
| extra food: return home empty | 2,0 | ||
| Substitute | ultralight tent (4,0 w/stakes) or silicone-impregnated nylon tarp (1,8 w/stakes and groundsheet) | average two-person tent (6,8 w/stakes) | 2,0 (min.) |
| small, streamlined rucksack (3,12) | internal frame pack w/metal stay (5,4) | 1,8 | |
| canister stove (0,3) | white gas stove (1,0) | 0,13 (w/o fuel) | |
| water bladder (0,1) | Lexan water bottle (0,5) | 0,4 | |
| iodine tablets or chlorine dioxide drops (0,2) | water filter (0,10) | 0,8 | |
| extra pile hat (0,2) | extra fleece shirt (0,10) | 0,8 | |
| approach shoes (2,0) | leather boots (4,8) | 2,8 | |
| ultralight raingear (0,15 for top and bottom) | mountain stormgear (3,0 for suit) | 2,1 | |
| titanium 2-liter pot (0,61/2) | stainless steel 2-liter pot (0,91/2) | 0,3 | |
| professional-quality point-and-shoot camera (0,7) | SLR camera and lens (1,12) | 1,5 | |
| MINIMUM SAVINGS: 22 pounds 4 ounces | |||

Editors' Choice 2013
Boost Your Apps
Carry the Best Maps
FREE Rocky Mountain Trip Planner
Survival Skills 101 • Eat Better
READERS COMMENTS
Less weight = less calories burned = less food needed.
Less weight = better = funner
If you hike for 8 hours, go light, I run circles around my friends and they are more in shape than me!
i never knew people packed so much crap. in my 20 years of backpacking (i'm 28) i've never carried more than a 25 pound pack on 3-4 day trips in the high sierra, grand canyon, etc. - but as a girl who gets cold, i say don't skimp on warmth, skimp on food. i've never carried a stove or all the gear associated with that. so, i'd suggest skipping that for sure.
two words. soccer shorts. light, dry fast, look more acceptable than boxers, and most of all, don't hold odor like boxers do.
more than 15 years ago, i have insisted that trekking should be done as light as possible, today it is still a matter of how much money to spend on this ultralight
I'm 59 and just did the Grand Canyon (South Kaibab and Bright Angel) with a 42 lb. pack. It was very tough for me at 195 lbs. I will go light.
ADD A COMMENT