Utah's San Rafael Swell.
Since there's never such a thing as too many wild and protected places, we think
Obama's potential plan to create as many as 14 new national monuments is a good thing. Spread across nine western states, the designation would confer extra protection and management support to these ecologically diverse habitats.
Of course, a lot of these places won't be news to your average far-reaching hiker—they'll just be getting official designation and, in some cases, shiny new names. The new monuments could include:
-San Rafael Swell, UT
-Montana’s Northern Prairie, MT
-Lesser Prairie Chicken Preserve, NM
-Berryessa Snow Mountains, CA
-Heart of the Great Basin, NV
-Otero Mesa, NM
-Northwest Sonoran Desert, AZ
-Owyhee Desert, OR/NV
-Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument, CA (expansion)
-Vermillion Basin, CO
-Bodie Hills, CA
-The Modoc Plateau, CA
-Cedar Mesa, UT
-San Juan Islands, WA
Alaska's Bristol Bay and Teshekpuk Lake and
Wyoming's Red Desert (featured in a recent BACKPACKER issue) are also being considered for Conservation Designation status, which would protect them despite the fact that they're ineligible for national monument status.
Of course, not everybody's stoked about this—least of all Utah, whose governor has promised to fight the administration's plans tooth and nail. Utah senator Orrin Hatch also reportedly said, “You better believe I’ll do everything in my power … to prevent this designation.” Ouch.
What do you think? Are you worried monument status will expose your secret place to the wider world, or will it benefit from protections? Sound off in the comments section below.
—Ted Alvarez
via
The Adventure Life
Image Credit:
jakesmome
READERS COMMENTS
Less privately owned land will cause tax increases for everyone
Posted: Mar 11, 2010 Anonymous
The San Juan Islands have only a few acres of federal land. Not quite sure what "historic" or "scientific" feature exists in American Camp/British Camp, which commemorate the Pig War. The rest of the islands are either privately owned or state park. So what is the point?
Posted: Mar 04, 2010 Malby
I think the more areas that are preserved the better. Land once marred is never the same again. Preserve it now and if priorities change it can be unpreserved later for development (but hopefully not).
Posted: Feb 22, 2010 Brian
I'm all about it! Hopefully President Obama will take action sooner as opposed to later.
Posted: Feb 22, 2010 Jeffrey Hunter
Otero Mesa and Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument (i.e., Red Buttes) were also featured in a recent BACKPACKER issue. "Hike It, Save It" ran down a list of places we ought to protect (and how hiking them could help). Check it out:
http://www.backpacker.com/june_09_hike_it_save_it/destinations/13163
Posted: Feb 20, 2010 C.
I was hoping part of Idaho would get the Owyhee Desert designation
Posted: Feb 19, 2010 Anonymous
ADD A COMMENT